A Repost from Sunday, July 18, 2010 For Your Consideration

Here it is, titled The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly

Obama is Following the Cloward-Piven Strategy for Attacking America

Obama-Cloward-Piven

Admittedly, I have very few good things to say about either Richard Cloward or Frances Fox Piven.  I believe they are among this country’s most contemptible personalities.  I believe this because of their efforts to destroy American society and replace our traditional society with one modeled on the Soviet Union.  They are, in my view, classic examples of enemies of the state and they did everything within their power to bring this country’s government to its knees.  In spite of this disdain, a short summary of each is warranted as an introduction to this piece.

Richard Cloward (1926-2001) was a sociologist and political activist who developed the notion that criminal behavior is caused by social factors.  It was a notion that sought to find an explanation for unacceptable behavior by blaming everyone, except, of course, for the criminal himself.  In 1966, Cloward published a paper that he titled “The Weight of the Poor: A strategy to end poverty[1],” and co-founded the National Welfare Rights Organization and advocated federalization of Aid to Families with Dependent Children.  To Cloward, the Constitutional limitation of government didn’t really matter; ardent communists rarely care about Constitutions and such.  In 1992, he and his wife Frances Fox Piven created another organization called “Human SERVE” (Service Employees[2] Registration and Voter Education), which helped to establish the so-called motor-voter programs leading to the Motor Voter Act of 1993[3].

Frances Fox Piven (1932—) unfortunately remains with us today.  She remains a professor of political science and sociology with the University of New York system, and was previously associated with Boston College.  Her parents immigrated to Canada, where she was born, and then further migrated to the United States.  Piven was raised in Jackson Heights, Queens, New York and became a naturalized citizen in 1953.  She received a Ph.D. from the University of Chicago in 1962.  At Boston University, she was an associate of Dr. Murray Levin and Dr. Howard Zinn (both of whom promoted Marxism) and participated with them in the so-called professor’s strike in 1979.  She continues to associate herself with the Democratic Socialists of America organization.  Among those who think this isn’t so bad, you will please note that Vladimir Lenin established socialism as the only viable path to communism.

Together, Cloward-Piven developed what has become known as the Cloward-Piven Strategy, outlined in 1966 and calling for the overloading of the U. S. public welfare system in order to precipitate crises that were beyond the ability of government bureaucracies to manage.  It would, in other words, cause the collapse of the U. S. government and lead to the creation of a national welfare state paid for through onerous taxation imposed upon working Americans.  Cloward-Piven supposed that this could be the result of forcing the Democratic Party (which in 1966 controlled both houses of Congress and the presidency) to federalize all poverty based programs.  Now of course, this is very close to what Lyndon Johnson foresaw in his now infamous Great Society scam ... which Americans are still struggling to pay for today.  In The Weight of the Poor, Cloward-Piven wrote, “The ultimate objective of this strategy —to wipe out poverty by establishing a guaranteed annual income—will be questioned by some.  Because the ideal of individual social and economic mobility has deep roots, even activists seem reluctant to call for national programs to eliminate poverty by the outright redistribution of income.”

We do not need to study further Barack Obama’s stated goals toward the redistribution of income —he’s been doing this very thing now since the American people elected him to the presidency in 2008.  Instead, consider the people with whom Obama has surrounded himself, and you come up with a composite of neo-Marxist activism over the past 60 years.  Then add to this mix the strategy, which is to so overwhelm the federal system that it will collapse upon itself and open the way for extraordinary executive action.  Has Barack Obama employed the Cloward-Piven strategy to destroy what is left of the United States of America?  The number of assaults on our social and political culture has been nothing if not overwhelming —it has been a continuous onslaught even to the extent that most people have been unable to keep up with all of Obama’s shenanigans. 

·         Mr. Obama and his acolytes have undertaken to rewrite American history, even to include the assertion that Mohammedans participated in the American Revolutionary War.  There is nothing in history even remotely accurate in this, but it serves to demonstrate how Obama seeks to change our history.  If you can change a country’s history—or the people’s perception of it, then you can likewise redefine national character and culture.

·         Mr. Obama went on an international apology tour where he visited European and Middle Eastern countries—telling these people that Americans are arrogant and egocentric, that our claim to American Exceptionalism is undeserved.  It was a two-fold mission: Obama also intended to send a strong message to the American people about what he thought of them, and of the United States.

·         By asserting federal authority over private corporations, at the taxpayer’s expense, of course, he usurped the Constitutional limits on federal government.  In this, Barack Obama had the willing assistance of every single Democrat in the Congress, and particularly of the Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi[4].

·         Barack Obama has increased federal spending and increased our national debt to in excess of $17 trillion.  In 2008, our national debt was only $9.8 trillion.  US federal spending increased from $2.8 trillion to $3.5 trillion, which amount to budget deficits of $294 billion and $606 billion, respectively.

·         Since taking office, Barack Obama has signed 180 executive orders, thereby bypassing the legislative process and pushing forward the notion that he is creating an imperial presidency.  Arguments abound whether the number of his executive orders are extraordinary, but rather than looking at the number of executive orders, we should consider the topics where he has sought to circumvent Congress[5].

·         Under Barack Obama, the government has imposed high taxes on job creators and created huge budget deficits.  Some say this is the worst-case scenario of any administration since Gaius Julius Caesar Augustus Germanicus, whom everyone affectionately called Caligula; it is a paradox that forces one to wonder if Obama looks upon deficits as a mechanism to increase taxes.

·         Do near-zero interest rates act as a stimulus for a moribund economy, or does it act as a mechanism for demanding even more public funded welfare assistance and public sector hiring?  This we know for certain: low interest rates have sharpened the distinction between the haves and the have-nots.  Wealthy persons have benefitted, and the very poor don’t care because they are already getting something for nothing.

·         In the Time Before Obama, the production of natural gas and nuclear power were viewed as preferable alternatives to oil and coal, but since Obama —even in spite of his destruction of coal as an industry, what we now must contend with is enormously expensive electricity bills on the backs of those who can least afford it.  There will be no relief under Obama and one must wonder why he has undertaken these destructive policies.  Well, actually, we do know why.

·         Race relations in this country would not be worse today had either Condoleezza Rice or Colin Powell become our president —but under Barack Obama, racial polarization is at its highest levels since Reconstruction.  We have heard Eric Holder speak of “my people,” and we all heard him say that America is a nation of cowards ... but should anyone endeavor to have a discussion on race, they are immediately classified as racists and right-wing extremists.

·         In 2007, there were essentially two views about immigration policy.  Liberalists argued for relaxing immigration rules (in order to increase their voter base), while realists favored border sovereignty and reinforcing that America is a nation of laws.  No one can embark upon a path to citizenship that is willing to break our immigration laws on their first day.  Today, under Obama, illegal immigrants are streaming across our borders in droves.  The debate has become both racial and political.  Recently, suddenly, and quite inexplicably, tens of thousands of children have arrived at our border and these have somehow managed to end up in Arizona, whose sovereign is Governor Jan Brewer, a hated enemy of the Obama camp.

·         A little over one year ago, we learned the extent to which the NSA is spying on the American people; two years ago we learned that Obama’s IRS was being used as a political vendetta mechanism against conservatives; three years ago we learned that the Social Security Administration and IRS paid out multiple millions of dollars rewarding democratic employees for their loyalty.  It is no wonder then, that Obama and his henchmen don’t actually care what we think about Benghazi or the Taliban Five.

·         Obama also announced a preference for the Mohammedan Brotherhood operating inside the United States, and specifically within American prisons, and in this process of ingratiating himself to this foreign ideology, Obama gave us the Arab Spring, which is nothing but an unmitigated disaster for US foreign policy and American credibility abroad.  Now, many Americans go to bed at night asking for an American Spring —whereby we may somehow rid ourselves of this pathetic excuse for a president.

·         Finally, we have noted one continuous assault upon our Second Amendment rights, and at the same time we learn that the Obama administration is providing military- style arms and equipment to local police agencies.  The likely purpose for this is enough to send chills up our spines.  What is Obama planning for us next?

Who is helping Obama to manage the never-ending stream of crises?  Why, John Podesta, of course —and Valerie Jarrett, both of whom are vapid Marxists; red-diaper babies and adherents to the view that they can destroy America, they can demoralize the American people, by overwhelming them and their institutions —Cloward-Piven.

At this stage, of course ... there is nothing anyone can do about this.  Obama has a free reign for another 3 years.  It may even be true that we haven’t seen anything yet...

---

[1] Advocating the defeat of poverty by causing the collapse of Republican democracy

[2] Any similarity between this and the Service Employees International Union is more than coincidental

[3] Which explains how illegal aliens are able to vote, along with citizens long deceased

[4] Remember this the next time you hear a Democratic politician tell you how much he loves the American way of life...

[5] List of United States Federal Executive Orders (13489 and above)

We Are On The Endless Road

Only One Guitar Being Played

Liberals and Losers Can't Help It. It May Not Be Their Fault. Just Hear Me Out

So, we're constantly finding out about how people in various states of health and alternate lifestyle are that way because of their genetics.

Today, let's focus on the loser.  Mostly libtards but not necessarily.  These are people who simply have a hard time getting out of bed in the morning, maintaining their homes and landscapes, and generally merging into society to any productive degree.  Typically these people are in a situation where their financial responsibilities are Our (productive people with normal genetics) problem to take care of.  Surely no one would argue that the woman with the broken leg should receive proper medical attention regardless of her financial stature or ability to compensate the medical community either immediately or at any time in the future.  She might have substantial contraceptive bill like sandra fluke.  Everyone has the right to sex right?

So, where do we draw the line on where we become unwilling to support  a person who through bad genetics simply isn't able to maintain their lifestyle ? I'm thinking that just like the naked emperor obama and his red lines, there really is no actual red line.

If a person simply cannot motivate themselves to learn things, make their beds, look for and maintain employment, it very well may not be any fault of theirs.  It likely is a medical/genetic situation.  

So, my point here is: We need to accept that those of us fortunate to be born with genes that cause us to be productive tax paying Machines take on the responsibilities of those in our society who simply cannot cope with working and paying their way through life, regardless if they choose to have 13 kids or whatever.  They should have just as good a life as we do. Maybe even better.  After all, they have this plague, most of us call Loser, but in reality is a Disability.  A Severe Disability.

While we're on it, I think I may be coming down with this problem myself, later in life of course.  I've blown all my money on these folks, and the modest entertainments I've allowed myself to enjoy and now find myself in a situation where I may have to sell my golf clubs and be planting mousetraps in a single wide on the outskirts of Detroit in a modest trailer park known as Shady Acres.  If any of you Severely Productive Types want to work just a little harder and front me some cash so I'll be able to afford a smart car to haul me and the misses to bingo on Friday night, or alternately a top of the line Super Bus and enough free cash to explore this great brave land of ours, it would be appreciated.  I can't guarantee I'll be able to pay you back.  One that carries a luxury sports car for exploring around when we stop over somewhere would be great.  If it was amphibious as well in case the ice caps melt, that would be super.  Your generosity would probably make me even cry.

The Society of the USA Requires Participation by The Vast Majority

Maybe I could say any free civilized society requires participation by the majority.
Maybe I could even say that a socialist society requires participation by the majority.  Maybe that's even more sensitive to coordinated effort since there are more people to support.  More people who are not giving, but rather receiving.  A Double Whammy.  Like some loser is not only Not paying taxes, but they are also demanding a share of the taxes others are paying.

Now what um Sayin?

A simple example.  Red Lights.  People continue to  assume there is a 2 to 4 second grace period where they can run a red light, at least in Cincinnati. Quickly that becomes the norm.  Structure, rules of the road go by the wayside.  In heavier traffic, people who were waylayed by rude Bastids going through the red light in the opposing traffic situation now feel cheated and have no problem evening up the score so they too assume a 2 to 4 (+1) grace period on the red light.
It escalates. The situation falls apart. Non-participation in the traffic light situation causes the Entire System to fail.  Chaos.

We have massive societal chaos now.  92 million people of working age out of work and not even looking.  Jobs may not even be there.  Many more people going to college taking out loans for 100k that they'll not pay back for the most part.

In short, the people propping up the building are becoming so much less than the building weighs.  Picture the Empire State Building supported by a bunch of toothpicks. It isn't going to last.  It is going to come crashing down and the people most hurt by it will be the takers/losers who haven't learned how to survive without a handout.

Chaos is coming if America continues to vote for democrats.  Maybe even if they vote for repubblekins too.  Just sayin.

"We aint' lookin too good right now." as said by a NASA dude in the movie Armageddon to which Truman replied "No Shit".

Beware of Cognitive Bias

The 12 Forms of Cognitive Bias


Does this mean we should give libtards opinions another look ??

Nope.  Been there, done that.

How Many Languages are Spoken on Earth

According this account.  100. 

So why in the hell does everyone assume that all people of some alien planet or species will speak the same language.  ie. Martian.

It's not just the commoners. It's Hollywood. It's every movie involving an alien planet. It's every science fiction book ever written with the possible exception of one I haven't read.  Literally every movie, every Meme, Every inference to an alien plant assumes that everyone on that planet speaks the same language.

Do aliens make the same assumption?  Imagine them landing here in Denmark, decoding the language, then moving on to Russia or China, or the USA and expecting everyone to speak Danish.  They'd be confused.   Am I the first person to notice this?  Yes. I am.  I'm also the first person to use the word libtard and also hildebeast.  If I'm not, I've never heard of any of those terms before I used them.  Que the Johhny Weismiller shout.

Well, if aliens do show up here, the percentages say they are not here to give us presents.  They are here to take our resources at the minimum.  I suggest we all learn to speak Navajo and become code talkers. We need every advantage we can get with creatures able to arrive here from light years distance.  We can't even get to Mars.

liberals Explained

I wrote this post as a response to this Beautifully narrated video that I found at the Beautiful Genius Lisa's blog.

libtards lives and beliefs and actions are all about fantasy and sociopathic behavior..

Their main course of action is appeasement because -They don't understand evil or really believe that it exists.  So when something like 9-11 happens, they all hop on board the scam put forth By the Muslims that 'Bush did it'.  They hate the Iraq war when Bush is in charge, and they want to see the body count displayed on TV updated in real time.  When obama, a democrat liberal is in the white house, they don't care about the military sons and daughters.  They don't care about the wars or the massive buildup of moving targets obama sent to Afghanistan.  They Don't Care, as long as they're not hearing about it like they did when Bush was in the white house.

They hate conflict. Like little children when conflict or confrontation arises, they put their hands over their ears and eyes, and their minds go black.  Literally, they are unable to process and understand.  

Imagine in this environment we have today, they are actually Supporting Disarming Themselves. !

They hate Israel because it is a constant source of confrontation and the frequent news that forces them to be exposed to that confrontation. They want it to go away, and they look at a map and they see tiny Israel, and Big middle east islamic countries surrounding it, and they immediately deduce (with their simple minds for processing information) that the winners in this fight will be the big middle east islamic countries so they support these rather than Israel.  It will be over much more quickly that way.

There is nothing going on here in their sociopathic minds that has to do with right and wrong.  Sociopaths are unable to process right and wrong.  They navigate life by trial and error, and they react to each and every situation based solely on what will result in the best outcome for them.  Period.  The only thing they can think about is they are tired of hearing about this Israel thing. Kill them and make it stop is all that they are thinking about.

They don't have a problem with islam, women's rights, gay rights or even their own rights as the US government continues to whittle away at them.  To a libtard the past does not exist and the future is not important.  Only their happiness in this particular moment is important.

They don't care about anyone else.  Any issue they adopt and champion is Only for the purpose of driving a wedge into society with the intention of winning elections and staying in power to implement their unaffordable and life and liberty destroying programs.  They are a disease, a cancer upon a civilized society.

Libtard Lesson # 41

Trying to talk to libtards about the issues is like trying to talk to seagulls about tomorrows algebra lesson while on the outside patio of a seafood restaurant.

10,000 Galaxies

Like children, running out into the universe to play.
Increments of time meaningless.
To infinity and beyond.
Constantly changing.
Not caring.

Click the picture of course for a more sane description.

The American Dream is Unattainable

As testified to by the very morons that would vote for obama until the moon turns to blue cheese.  Par for the course with libtards.

Young adults, age 18 to 34, are most likely to feel the dream is unattainable, with 63% saying it's impossible.


Read All about it.

liberals Views of Conservatives Are All Invalid

Why?

It is because liberals Need Conservatives to pay their way through life.

- Over and out.